One of the most appealing things about Julia Louis-Dreyfus is that she doesn’t mind looking vulnerable. It’s largely what has driven her popularity on “Seinfeld” and now on “Veep.” In both roles, she’s often caught off guard and she uses those moments to generate humor.
So when she found out that she had breast cancer a few weeks ago, she also used that moment – not to get laughs but to make the point that so many other people do not have health insurance to cover treatments for cancer and other serious diseases. Therefore, she said, it is imperative that universal health care become a reality in this country.
In other words, she did not dwell on her own situation but used it as a teachable moment for everyone. And she is in a position to get people to listen. So are you listening, President Trump? And have you thought about getting a new “Veep?”
Hang in there, Julia. We’re all pulling for you.
So when he’s not demeaning grieving relatives of fallen solders, football players expressing their views or a senator suffering from brain cancer, President Trump still finds time to issue an executive order which, if implemented, could unilaterally dismantle the portions of Obamacare that were specifically designed to help low-income and sick people.
If the provisions in this order are implemented, it would mean that smaller insurance companies could band with large ones and potentially escape the safeguards guaranteed in Obamacare. It would also be the end of the subsidies regularly given to insurance companies to help low-income people maintain their health insurance. And it would mortally gut the recruitment programs that help people navigate their way through the confusing health insurance morass.
All this right before open enrollment begins on November 1. As someone said, making America sick again.
See the article below:
In Kenny Fries’s recent NYT column, he described how Hitler targeted people with disabilities as well as Jews for extermination. He was able to do this because he convinced his followers that these lives were not as valuable as others, and that the world would be better off without them.
But Mr. Fries did not stop at the Holocaust – he also wrote about how similar thinking caused the Supreme Court to allow involuntary sterilization of women considered “imbeciles” to keep them from “continuing their kind.” (See my 9/29/17 post)
Mr. Fries then went on to say that while Hitler was demonized and involuntary sterilization is now almost alway illegal, there is a certain kind of thinking that still lingers – the idea that it is socially and economically acceptable to prioritize certain kinds of lives over others. He also wrote that it is this kind of thinking that justifies the calls for cutting Medicaid and irrevocably worsening the lives of many people – especially the elderly, the poor and the disabled.
One of the people Mr. Fries referred to was the Rev. Susan Flanders. Ms. Flanders has since written a letter to the NYT, saying that she believes Mr. Fries inaccurately portrayed her views. “The issue here is whether people can have a quality of life that is meaningful and valuable to them” she wrote, ”…and I would never favor cutting short such a life.”
In the interest of being fair to both sides, I am attaching a copy of her letter below. But I would never try to represent that this issue is as simple as two opposing posts. After all, we are literally talking about life and death here.